Hands down, my favorite film on the list. I'm a pretty big nerd when it
comes to zombie stuff, or really anything apocalypse. But beside Danny Boyle's
directorial magic, there's something special about the zombie in 28
Days Later; it’s fast, viral, and even deliberate. Before the era of 28 Days Later, one might think of the Night of the Living Dead type zombie;
slow, lumbering nuisances that are only formidable in large numbers. These aren’t
exactly the “Braaaaaaaiiiiiiiiins” type zombies. They are particularly
terrifying because they are so fast and deadly, and as Munteen and Payne put
it, “emotional”. They screech and scream and snarl, they puke blood which is extremely
viral and contagious, they literally spew their ideology. So why are these
zombies so viral? This is where Munteen and Payne’s article, “Attack of the
Living Dead: Recalibrating Terror in the Post-September 11 Zombie Film”, comes
into play. They so effably describe the movie zombie as a sort of tabula rasa, a philosophical term made
famous by John Locke, literally translated as “blank slate”. This is to say
that the zombie is a movie monster that starts as a blank slate, and is
projected upon by the social and cultural fears and anxieties of the time. So,
this being said, would explain multiple narratives of the movie zombie,
starting with the Night of the Living
Dead zombie. As it was released in 1968, the most current World event of
the time was the Cold War. This was a war that was fought quietly, behind the
scenes, via intelligence; if one were to ever think of spies and double agents
and what not, this was the war. Part of this style of “warfare” was the
spreading of ideology, particularly the threat of the spread of communism to
the west; i.e. the Red Scare. This threat was a slow and gradual descent,
fought off via propaganda and counter-intelligence. Much like this spreading of
ideology, the movie zombie at the time was slow, quiet, and lumbering; all
while maintaining a menacing appearance. So what makes the 28 Days Later zombie so different: why domestic terrorism! Munteen
and Payne posited that the incident of 911, the first example of domestic terrorism
in the States, was the social anxiety and fear that penetrated to movie-making
world. It gave need for a new, scarier, and in a way, more relatable zombie.
That is exactly what the film delivered. A viral, panicked, emotional zombie.
Friday, June 1, 2018
"28 Days Later" Zombie Projection
Hands down, my favorite film on the list. I'm a pretty big nerd when it
comes to zombie stuff, or really anything apocalypse. But beside Danny Boyle's
directorial magic, there's something special about the zombie in 28
Days Later; it’s fast, viral, and even deliberate. Before the era of 28 Days Later, one might think of the Night of the Living Dead type zombie;
slow, lumbering nuisances that are only formidable in large numbers. These aren’t
exactly the “Braaaaaaaiiiiiiiiins” type zombies. They are particularly
terrifying because they are so fast and deadly, and as Munteen and Payne put
it, “emotional”. They screech and scream and snarl, they puke blood which is extremely
viral and contagious, they literally spew their ideology. So why are these
zombies so viral? This is where Munteen and Payne’s article, “Attack of the
Living Dead: Recalibrating Terror in the Post-September 11 Zombie Film”, comes
into play. They so effably describe the movie zombie as a sort of tabula rasa, a philosophical term made
famous by John Locke, literally translated as “blank slate”. This is to say
that the zombie is a movie monster that starts as a blank slate, and is
projected upon by the social and cultural fears and anxieties of the time. So,
this being said, would explain multiple narratives of the movie zombie,
starting with the Night of the Living
Dead zombie. As it was released in 1968, the most current World event of
the time was the Cold War. This was a war that was fought quietly, behind the
scenes, via intelligence; if one were to ever think of spies and double agents
and what not, this was the war. Part of this style of “warfare” was the
spreading of ideology, particularly the threat of the spread of communism to
the west; i.e. the Red Scare. This threat was a slow and gradual descent,
fought off via propaganda and counter-intelligence. Much like this spreading of
ideology, the movie zombie at the time was slow, quiet, and lumbering; all
while maintaining a menacing appearance. So what makes the 28 Days Later zombie so different: why domestic terrorism! Munteen
and Payne posited that the incident of 911, the first example of domestic terrorism
in the States, was the social anxiety and fear that penetrated to movie-making
world. It gave need for a new, scarier, and in a way, more relatable zombie.
That is exactly what the film delivered. A viral, panicked, emotional zombie.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment